Sunday, 21 October 2012

Central American Frontiers - Costa Rica

Step 2 -Costa Rica

Visa Preparation

Costa Rica Passport
Similar to Panama, those with US, most EU, Central or Southern American passport do not require a visa to visit Costa Rica. Panamanians, Nicaraguans and other Central Americans may alternatively enter with their National ID card for short visits. Costa Rica does however demand that all passengers hold an onward or return ticket, and this rule is strictly enforced.


Residence Permits - Perpetual Tourists
Costa Rica, as the name suggests, is the most wealthy nation in the region and this has proven an attraction for migrant workers. Despite significant numbers of foreign workers relocating here, work permit applications take months to be processed and this has lead to whats known as the "perpetual tourist status". People from all kinds of backgrounds, including Nicaraguan laborers and US owners of hostels and restaurants in Costa Rica, live as 'perpetual tourists' meaning that they must leave the country every 90 days, before re- entering on a new 90 day tourist visa. In this manner they maintain a semi legal status, in so far as their presence is legal but their labor is not. 'Perpetual Tourism' is such a common situation that expat types have taken to explaining the process step by step on websites, apparently with the knowledge of Costa Rican authorities.


Panama - Costa Rica Border

Entry - Costa Rica
Entry into Costa Rica from Panama at the Sixaloa crossing is a simple affair, once you don't fall between the sleepers of the abandoned Chiquita Banana railway bridge. There are no Customs inspections but those interested in following the rules are welcome to approach the immigration desk for an entry stamp. Arriving passengers must fill one form and, in theory, should present an onward ticket demonstrating how they will exit Costa Rica after their visit (local bus drivers tell us that a 50c bus ticket back to the first town in Panama is acceptable). Multiple others chose to (or accidentally) skip this hassle altogether and simply walk on past the arrivals immigration post unchallenged. Inside, the officer on duty did have a digital passport reader and arrival data seemed to be entered into a computer. We were asked where we were going and the answer "San Juan" proved sufficient. We were in Costa Rica.

Internal Controls
On entering Costa Rica, the next step was to get the capital San Juan. Bus combinations to the capital take approximately 7 hours via the regional capital Lemon. Not long after we started this journey, the public bus upon which we were travelling was stopped as we left the local canton. At the checkpoint, passports were carefully checked to ensure all on board had entered legally. This check would likely have caught anyone who failed to cross the border legally, including those who may have avoided the official checkpoint by coming via the mountains or sea (from Bocas Island in Panama). That said, locals told us that unofficial crossings are common, with one even boasting his using an ATV (quad bike) on a regular basis to sneak across cheap alcohol.

Hotels and transport providers do not register passport information with the authorities. Hotels are happy with a name for the residents log and bus tickets do not include names or ID numbers, as is the norm in some other Central American countries.

We traveled north along the Puenta Arenos Coast as far as the regional capital Lemon before heading in-land to San Jose. From there we took a long distance bus (8 hours) north to Los Chiles, where we had been told that speedboats bring passengers through dense jungle rivers across the border into San Carlos in Nicaragua. On this part of the journey we traveled with a group of young Nicaraguans, returning home to visit family. These migrant workers were heading back after completing a three month stint 'as tourists,' aka working in San Juan. Although they had family and friends working in the US, they had chosen the relative lower wages of Costa Rica after hearing of friends getting caught at US border and of others who had made it into the US but had not found work. One was an 18 year old from Bluefields in eastern Nicaragua and the other was 19 and from just outside the capital Managua. This was their first time travelling home, a journey they are likely to repeat every 90 days for many years to come. 

Departure - Costa Rica

Los Chiles Pier - Awaiting Boat to Nicaragua
Los Chiles is a difficult border to navigate, primarily due to the meddling of the speed boat company crew. Officially there is one form to fill out before getting your passport stamped, however the various speed boat crew members try their best to make the process confusing by stealing all the forms and by providing inaccurate information. At that point they then present themselves as a helpful source of information and forms (for a small fee of course). 

Our Nicaraguan travel companions planned on returning to Costa Rica in a matter of days, so they were nervous that the Costa Rican authorities would question them about their 'tourism' in Costa Rica. They chose to pay the speed boat company staff to fill all their forms, clearly nervous about the whole process and hoping to avoid attracting any attention. 


Boat Crew Fill Forms (for a small fee)
Official inspections when exiting at Los Chiles are in effect very lax, however the speed boat staff did strictly ensure each passenger had their exit stamp before letting anyone board. That said, when an incoming boat arrived from Nicaragua, it was clear that arriving passengers were subject to much stricter immigration and customs controls than we had seen at Sixaloa. We watched the authorities question some young men for almost half an hour, meanwhile our Nicaraguan friends sick with worry at what awaited them next week on their return. Perhaps Costa Rica are more focused on immigrants arriving from the North than the South! 

Once we got going, the boat made its way up a long meandering river to a Nicaraguan military outpost. Here we were boarded by members of the Nicaraguan Military and some bags selected at random were searched. After a further hour or so of travel, we arrived at San Carlos Immigration and Inspection area in Nicaragua. Goodbye Costa Rica, Hello Nicaragua!


Step 3 - Nicaragua - Check back in the coming days!


More Information:
Perpetual Tourism - Doing Costa Rica - Click here!
Migration Tensions - Geo Currents - Click here!
Immigration and Residency Law - CostaRicaLaw - Click here!
Migrant Workers in Costa Rica - USA Today - Click here!

Saturday, 29 September 2012

Central American Frontiers - Panama

Step 1 - Panama
The InterAmericana Missing Gap - Darien
Famous as a short-cut route for gold rush types heading west, and later for the canal linking the two oceans, Panama has long been a transit country for people en-route to somewhere else. Despite being made rich by connecting east with west, many are surprised to learn that Panama is the virtual cul-de-sac of Central America.  Even though it borders (and was once part of) Colombia to the south, there are no roads or navigable routes through the Darien Gap, leaving no land route south from Central to Southern America. Panama is therefore the ideal place to begin our trip as it represents the south most point of the northern InterAmericana Highway, which otherwise notionally stretches from Alaska to Tierra Del Fuego. It is apparently possible to make the trek across the thick jungle from Colombia, but most choose a speed boat or short flight to avoid the mosquitoes, snakes and guerrillas. Either way - Panama is our starting point! 

Visa Preparation 
EU, US, most regional and most South American passport holders do not require a visa to enter Panama, whilst others must apply for a visa in advance. Interestingly however, anyone of any nationality holding a used, yet still valid, visa issued by the US, EU, Australia or Canada may also enter Panama by purchasing a ‘Tourist Card’ on arrival. Nice and easy then it seems.

The Journey Begins
Most people arriving into Panama do so either at Tocumen airport, or by cruise liner via the canal. Our arrival was to be at 2 am, courtesy of a dirt cheap $75 Spirit Air flight from Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  Heres hoping Ryanair don't find out that they get away with charging for carry on!

Hickup at Check-In
Most countries (including Panama, Ireland and the USA) require arriving tourists to be in possession of a return or onward ticket prior to granting entry. This rule is seldom enforced - however apparently it is enforced by Panama. Alarm bells should have sounded when the Spirit Air online check-in system produced a notice to appear in person rather than giving me the boarding pass I was expecting. At check-in, production of a ticket home from Mexico to Ireland did not satisfy their requirements and we were refused boarding. After what seemed like an eternity arguing the case, the stern yet professional staff agreed to send an email to the Panamanian authorities requesting a waiver of the return ticket requirement on our behalf. To my disbelief a response in the positive came within minutes - Apparently Panamanian Immigration officers were burning the night oil. We were on the flight. 

Entry - Panama
Panama requires a Customs form (per family) and an Immigration form (per person) to be completed before approaching the Passport Control. The Immigration form is a carbon copy affair, the idea being that you should keep the second slip to present on exiting - hence allowing some unfortunate civil servant in a dark cave somewhere to record that you did in fact leave before your visa expired (Like the ID90 white slip in the US).The officer asked only two questions; Where we would stay? and; How long we would be in Panama? Although she clearly had no idea what I tried to say in responce due to my broken Spanish, we were stamped in and had arrived in Panama. No digital passport reader, biometrics nor computerised records of arrival were taken. Surprisingly also, both the 'Tourist Card' and the carbon copy requirement seem to have been discontinued as we left with just stamped passports and no extra bits- Either way, first border done and dusted!

Land Transport in Panama
Whilst ‘diablo rojos’ (so called red devil buses) do make the 25km journey into the city, we were informed that they don’t take cash and don’t run at night, so we opted to test our negotiation skills and try bargain a taxi. Thirty minutes and $28 later we were at our $15 a night hostel and were ready for bed. Hotels in Panama do not collect biometric or passport information relating to guests. Panama has one rail line, which only runs north south, parallel to the canal. Outside of that, the only public transport is by bus. The next morning after a quick photo by the massive MiraFlores locks on the Panama Canal, we chose the bus, surprisingly enough, and began the trip north-west toward CostaRica via Panama's second city David. The bus to David costs approx $15 and takes 6 hours. From there the border is a further hour or so. Long distance international bus lines also operate direct connections from Panama City to SanJose in CostaRica along the InterAmericana.


Panama CostaRica Border at Sixaloa 
Departure - Panama
Instead of following the main route we decided to use the smaller and lesser used Guabito/Sixaloa crossing a few hours to the north. This crossing leaves from the heart of the Panamanian Afro Caribbean District and is known for being 'hassle free'. Hassle free proved to be an understatement as this free for all border crossing appeared intentionally designed to allow anyone slip past. To exit Panama one must buy a $3 exit permit sticker followed by handing your passport in to a second official through a bank teller style window for stamping. There is no opportunity for the passport officer to check that faces match passports as multiple passports, of both arriving and departing passengers, are piled high in front of the stamp wielding officer. In addition, those disinterested with getting an exit stamp (such as Panamanians travelling with their National Identity Card) simply walk past unchallenged. There are no formal Customs checks before crossing the dilapidated and disused Chiquita Banana railway bridge into Costa Rica. This would be an easy border to cross without papers.

Next Step - Costa Rica

Thursday, 16 August 2012

Central American Frontiers

Panama to the U.S. by land  -  Two Irish Exploradores Follow the Migrant Trail

As the US Customs and Border Patrol boosts it's numbers to almost 10,000 this year and as almost US$ 6 Billion is to be spent to maintain the 'virtual fence' over the coming years, massive efforts are being made to improve border security. With numbers crossing falling, these efforts seem to be delivering results.

Despite this, a trickle of undocumented migrants continue to come to the USA by land from Mexico, Central America and farther afield. Following their path north along the Pan Americana, I hope to learn what barriers, borders, checkpoints and inspections they face along the way and why so many people continue to make the journey, despite increasing dangers. 

Starting in one month I will travel from the Panama to the US by land, crossing Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Belize and Mexico.  Along the way I will document the various border processes and inspection points in an effort to learn the lengths and hardships would-be migrants will go to in their struggle to reach the United States.

This journey across 8 countries will be unimaginably easier for two Irish travelers than for their undocumented compatriots, however we still hope to learn why large numbers still risk everything to try start a new life in the U.S.

First Stop - Panama City on the 22nd of September. Return then for updates!   


Links:






Tuesday, 5 June 2012

The Common Travel Area Between Ireland and the UK



More of a Concept Than an Actual Common Visa Zone

The Common Travel Area (CTA) which exists between Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK) could easily be assumed to be part of the greater European Union (EU) common border system, however this is not the case. Ireland and the UK, along with the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, have a unique common travel area separate from the Schengen zone, which covers most other EU states.

This CTA is unique in many ways and is far from being the multi state visa area one might think, rather it is an age old arrangement which seems to be understood somewhat differently by the two main actors, the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) and the UK Border Agency (UKBA).

Interestingly, there was no formal agreement signed between the two countries on the topic, rather the status quo has continued more or less unchanged since the emergence of the Irish state, allowing for citizens of either state to travel and reside unhindered as they choose. Furthermore, although the existence of the CTA was mentioned in the Treaty of Amsterdam, the system is still not provided for in legislation and remains therefore somewhat open to interpretation in its meaning.

History

Maintaining the free movement of people and goods was amongst a number of goals taken to smooth the transition from the Irish Free State to full independence. Along with the CTA and an automatic right of residence, employment, access to social services etc., Ireland (the republic) also allowed resident UK citizens to vote in national elections and to take up public service appointments, all in an effort to maintaining a flexible migration policy between the two states.

Similarly, the UK continued to allow free movement and residency rights for Irish citizens, much in the same manner as existed prior to Irish independence. The effect of these measures, and the maintenance of the status quo, saw the peoples of the islands maintain the flexibility and freedom in what became known as the Common Travel Area.

Application

In theory, the idea of the CTA is that there are no passport controls in operation for Irish and UK citizens traveling between the two countries. This then would likely be automatically extended to all EU citizens, as EU law generally demands equal treatment of all EU citizens. Irish and UK citizens can carry an acceptable form of photo-identification (see below) whilst presumably other EU nationals should carry either their national identity card or passport.

Acceptable ID for Irish and UK Citizens

  • A valid passport
  • A driver's license with photo
  • An international student card
  • A national ID card
  • A bus pass with photo
  • A Garda ID with photo
  • A work ID with photo

Rights Which Must Be Forgone to be Enjoyed

The problem with this situation is that neither Ireland nor the UK issue National ID cards. Therefore, their citizens have no easy method to prove their citizenship, and hence their entitlement to avail of the CTA arrangements. This presents a conundrum where in effect the easiest way for Irish or UK citizens to prove their citizenship is to carry their passport, negating the benefits afforded under the CTA in the first place. In this chicken and egg scenario, travelers often carry their passport, in effect to prove that they are not legally required to carry their passport.

Border Control and Random Checks
Whilst the position in the UK has generally not changed since Irish independence, Ireland has implemented some controls on arrivals from the UK since 1997, particularly for those arriving by air. In most Irish airports, all arriving passengers are required to pass passport control, whereas checks on road, rail and ferry crossings remain random and infrequent. If stopped, GNIB officials have the power to carry out checks and to refuse entry to the state on the same grounds as apply to people arriving from outside the CTA.

On the UK side, passengers arriving from Ireland (or elsewhere within the CTA) are not inspected by UKBA staff. Instead, those arriving from Irish airports are treated similarly to those arriving from domestic UK airports.

No Visa Cross Recognition
Unlike under the Schengen agreement, possession of a visa for the UK does not entitle a third country national to enter Ireland and vice versa. Visa required nationals who intend to visit both Ireland and the UK are required to apply for a visa for both countries. This results in the additional cost and hassle of dealing with two embassies and the need to make two separate applications in advance of traveling. On the ground, applicants for an Irish visa who intend to also visit the UK are normally asked by the relevant Irish embassy to first apply for their UK visa. Thereafter, those refused a UK visa are unlikely to be granted a visa for Ireland. This assuming that the Irish authorities are aware of the refusal, normally signaled by a small stamp in the passport.

The Schengen Visa Area
Ireland and Schengen
On a number of occasions Ireland has mooted the idea of joining the Schengen visa system, however this remains both impracticable and politically impossible where the UK remains outside. Under the regulations of Schengen visa membership, members with a border with an non-Schengen neighbor are required to implement strict controls at that external border. The idea of this is that external borders are protected by the local state immigration officials on behalf of the entire Schengen zone, thereafter allowing onward travel across the zone with no further checks.

In effect, if Ireland were to become a member of the Schengen zone, and the UK were to remain outside, it would be mandatory for Ireland to fence and secure the border around the six counties of Northern Ireland and to implement strict immigration controls on all border crossing points.

Politically this would be impossible for Ireland, as it would in effect divide the island physically, costing untold negative implications on north south relations, dividing families unnecessarily, hindering trade and tourism, as well as having enormous cost in terms of the manpower needed to regulate and control border crossings.

Similarly, it would equally not be politically feasible for the island of Ireland (including Northern Ireland) to join Schengen, as this would require checks on ferries and flights arriving into Belfast from Britain, something probably quite unacceptable to the Unionist community in Northern Ireland.

Operational Flaws
There are a number of major weaknesses with the current system which need to be addressed.

Firstly, Ireland and the UK have different requirements on third country nationals, when it comes to who requires a visa. For example, nationals of Malawi and Bolivia do not require a visa to visit Ireland for tourism purposes, whilst they do require a visa for a similar visit to the UK. In such a scenario, a well informed Malawian or Bolivian passenger who intends to travel to the UK illegally can avoid applying for a UK visa by simply traveling via Ireland. This is made all the more easy by virtue of the lack of control on passengers arriving into the UK from Ireland.

Furthermore, the UKBA have no method to learn of the passengers arrival as no information in this regard is passed between Irish and UK authorities. On the other hand however, if the passenger did inform GNIB officers of their intention to travel onward to the UK, then they may be refused permission to enter Ireland under the Aliens (Amendment) Order 1975.

Second, the system presents complications and red tape for non-EU nationals residing (legally) in either state. Unlike the Schengen visa area, non-EU nationals living and working legally in Dublin are not automatically entitled to visit Northern Ireland or Britain.

This problem is avoided in the Schengen zone where visa and residence permit holders are entitled to visit all states in the zone, despite their visa being issued by one particular Schengen member country. For example a Russian student in a university in France can travel as far Portugal, Finland or Greece without requiring a visa, however can not visit Ireland or the UK.

This impacts on business too. Whilst non-EU workers legally resident in any member state can apply for a 'Van der Elst' visa if their work requires travel to other EU states on official business, in effect this requirement to apply for additional visas effects those resident in Ireland and the UK disproportionately when compared to those resident in the Schengen zone states. Those with Schengen state issued resident permits may travel across the entire Schengen area unhindered, whilst those resident in Ireland and the UK would need to apply for a 'Van der Elst' for even a simple visit between Dublin and Belfast.

M1 Dublin - Belfast Motorway
Third, the current application of the CTA on the island of Ireland can cause accidental breaches of immigration law, particularly with the lack of demarcation of the border. Those familiar with driving between Northern Ireland and the Republic will be aware that it is very difficult for someone unfamiliar with the area to be confident where the actual border is. There are no checkpoints, nor lines. Signposts which are most commonly seen warn drivers that speed limits are measured in kilometers rather than miles per hour, without pointing out the reason for the change from imperial to metric.

Whilst this is important in terms of economic normalization in the region as well as the understandable desire of nationalists and others to avoid any obvious demarcation, the current system of political division existing simultaneously with an invisible border is highly unusual in immigration terms.

The point at which the northern six counties meet the twenty six counties of the Irish Republic does have important consequences in immigration, especially for non-EU visa required nationals. For those individuals, this is the point after which the validity of their visa ends, and if they hold a single entry visa, the point after which return may also be illegal or impossible.

Passengers traveling by taxi, bus or train are not informed of the approaching immigration frontier, probably because it has little significance to the driver, who is most likely an EU citizen. For any non-EU passenger however, crossing the frontier may be illegal and have serious consequences.

Take for example a Chinese national legally resident in Dublin who wishes to visit Donegal, say with work colleagues for a weekend. On making their trip north west, their route may take them across the border north of Monaghan and again back into the Republic at Castlefin in Donegal. It is likely that the Chinese national would remain blissfully unaware of his illegal entry into Fermannagh (i.e. Northern Ireland) and subsequent return to the Republic, as no signs nor police nor barriers announced his crossing of the frontier.

The law does not exist if it is not applied perhaps one might say? But if however he chose to travel on a bank holiday weekend, or was otherwise unlucky enough to be stopped by a random Garda checkpoint, he then risks the potential of deportation, if deemed to have breached UK immigration regulations or where he had a single entry visa for Ireland. Is this lack of transparency for unwitting non-EU citizens a good policy approach? I don't think it is.

Fourth, the CTA can be a hindrance for tourists to the UK, who may wish to add on a short trip to Ireland as part of their plans. Visa required tourists visiting the UK are unlikely to go to the effort of applying for a second visa for a short trip to Ireland. This in effect creates a barrier of entry to genuine tourists (who have already been checked and approved by the UKBA) from visiting Ireland.

This barrier has been identified by the Irish government and a pilot arrangement has been put in place for the Olympics summer season for citizens of some countries to address this problem. The issue here is that by restricting those who have already been issued a UK visa, genuine tourists are discouraged. At the same time, those with more sinister intent can simply come by ferry or bus and meet no inspections on arrival into Ireland. It seems unusual to guard one entry point so strictly whilst almost ignoring others.

Fifth, the CTA as it is currently applied, fails to utilize the potential of pooled resources between the UK Home Office and the Irish Departments of Justice. Along with duplication of visa determination procedures, the current system also fails to provide warnings on previous immigration history, visa rejections or criminal convictions etc. of arriving passengers. UK and Irish embassies are left unaware of each others work and decisions made, whilst at the very same time, they rely upon each other to secure the gate which provides access to the CTA from the respective sides.

What does Common Travel Area mean?

The CTA is a relic of Ireland's independence where for various political reasons, it was in the interest of Dublin and London to maintain the status quo. The delicate nature of affairs between the two states, particularly during the troubles in Northern Ireland, resulted in what is little more than a mutually beneficial understanding between the states, albeit perhaps with some difference of opinion on what exactly is understood.

In effect, as the UK don't check those arriving from Ireland at all, they entrust the Irish authorities to inspect and decide on the legitimacy of those arriving into the CTA on the Irish side without much question. The  reasons for may emanate from a blurring between what constitutes domestic/international since Irish independence, or perhaps the Home Office have simply determined that the overall risk, in terms of numbers arriving via Ireland, is minimal when compared to their major international airports and ferry crossings with continental Europe.

In this regard, Home Office, and other official reports regarding the UKBA Scotland and Northern Ireland administrative district, seem to focus very little on the Irish border. For passengers traveling the opposite direction however, the UKBA do take it upon themselves to pre-screen transit passengers who are traveling onward to Ireland. This action seems to suggest that they believe that passengers will not be re-screened on arrival in Dublin, which is not true. In effect, they seem to be operating as if the CTA were a joint visa zone, which is certainly a very different understanding than presented by the Irish.

Taking the opposite approach, Ireland inspects all arrivals by air, and performs random and sporadic checks on road, rail and sea passengers. Why there is a distinction between the treatment of air passengers as compared to others remains unclear, however it is most likely a product of manpower shortages coupled with a lack of political will for controls between the Republic and the six northern counties.

The continued screening of air passengers arriving from the UK is puzzling, especially at a time of severe pressures on Garda resources. Some point to Irish state attempting to demonstrate it's independence from its former colonial master as the reason for this, however it is much more likely that it happens simply as a matter of course due to the design of Irish airports, where arriving domestic and international passengers are intermingled.

Options for the Future

At the very least there is a need for enhanced cooperation in immigration matters, particularly in the area of visa determination. The current system which allows deportees from the UK to later go on to apply for an Irish visa and return to the UK via Dublin is a major failure and serves nobodies interests.

The lack of inspection of through passengers in the 200s area of Dublin airport is another major failure which needs to be addressed. In effect, the only person applying immigration inspections on behalf of the UK in this scenario is the boarding gate staff representing the airline. No government officials meet transiting passengers using the 200s at all, either transiting Ireland or arriving in the UK.

Ireland should request read-only access to the UKBA computer system. In this way, GNIB officers could be better informed when meeting arriving passengers with visas for the UK. Under current arrangements GNIB officers must either inspect the visas visually or otherwise must revert to phoning UKBA staff for advice, if they have any suspicions. Similarly, the Irish Department of Justice and Irish Embassies abroad could benefit greatly in their visa decision making process were they given access to additional information held by the UK Home Office. Arrangements could also be put in place to allow UKBA staff access GNIB files for the same purpose.

Realistically, Ireland and the UK should move toward a system where they either issue joint visas, or, at the very least, should allow transit / short term entry to holders of each others' visas. The actions of the UKBA seem to model this approach already, as those arriving from Ireland are all but ignored. Rather than ignoring those doing this however, it should be put on a statutory legal basis. Similarly, Ireland should trust decisions made by UKBA staff and summarily admit those who have already been issued a UK visa, and have already 'landed' in the UK.

In the same manner, those with residents permits for Ireland should be permitted an automatic short term visit visa exemptions to the UK and vice versa. This would not change the status quo, rather would legalize and regularize what is already happening on the ground. Such a step would allow GNIB efforts to be focused on more important matters, in particular to focus on flights from outside the CTA or outside the EU.

I personally would recommend ending checks on those arriving from the UK by air due to the potential cost savings involved. I also feel that these checks provide little benefit to the state, as any potential illegal entrants can simply opt to come by bus from Belfast. Further more, they seem to present a lack of joined up thinking on the issue, which needs to be discussed.

Time for a Plan

The 'Common Travel Area' which exists between Ireland and the UK appears to be interpreted differently by the Irish and UK governments. Rather than ignoring the issue and maintaining the flawed status quo there is an opportunity for the two states to improve cooperation in the area of immigration for their mutual benefit.

This is an excellent opportunity to regularize what is already happening on the ground and to extend the principles of free movement to all legal residents and visitors; either by issuing joint Ireland & UK valid visas or by implementing a blanket waiver for those holding a visa for one state to enter the other.

In December 2011 the British and Irish Governments signed a Memorandum of Understanding to improve the CTA. It will be interesting to watch what happens next.

Joe O Murchadha 05 June 2012

Additional Resources

Citizens Information – Common Travel Area - Click Here 
Varadkar calls for ‘mini-Schengen’ of UK and Ireland - Click Here
Memorandum of Understanding to Improve Common Travel Area - Click Here
CEPS Policy Brief - Click Here
Slugger O'Toole - General Discussion - Click Here
British-Irish Parliamentary Assembly - Click Here
UK Border Agency in Scotland and Northern Ireland: border operations - Click Here
Queens University Belfast – Center for International Borders Research - Click Here


Disclaimer - Policies, regulations and procedures on the ground change from time to time, however a diligent effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information. 

Saturday, 21 April 2012

Flight Connections at Dublin Airport



Dublin Airport is unique amongst the major European hub airports, insofar as it does not have an effective International Transit Zone, save the minor exception of the "200s" gates in T1. All passengers transiting via Dublin are required to pass Irish Immigration before proceeding to their onward flights, even when they have no intention of leaving the airport or visiting Ireland.

The reasons for this were traditionally blamed on the physical layout of Dublin Airport, yet this argument can not continue to hold especially since T2, which opened in 2011, also failed to include a transit hall and also requires all transiting passengers to clear Irish Immigration irrelevant of final destination.

The Transit Experience

In effect, the experience of transiting in Dublin differs greatly depending on (1) which gate your arriving and departing flights happen to use, (2) whether or not you have your onward boarding pass, (3) whether or not your luggage is checked to your final destination and (4) what passport you hold.

Passengers arriving at the "100s" gates (familiar to most Ryanair passengers) walk under the departure area and follow the elevated glass corridor before arriving at Immigration. Then they must walk the full length of the T1 baggage hall before climbing an escalator and taking two sharp bends before being spit out awkwardly at the main T1 security search point.

Passengers arriving at the "200s" gates (AirFrance/CityJet, AerArann/AerLingus Regional, FlyBe and others) follow a similar, if shorter route, unless they happen to have a connection departing from the same area.  If they arrive and depart from the "200s," they can board their next flight without passing any security or Immigration checks at all. Yes, these are the gates normally used for flights to Donegal, and yes passengers arriving from abroad can avoid immigration entirely and enter Ireland unchecked this way.

Passengers arriving at the "300s" gates (Lufthansa, Turkish Airlines, BMI and others) meet Irish Immigration in the recently revamped old US PreClearance area before arriving in the middle of the T1 baggage hall. From there they follow the same route via the esculator at baggage belt 1. All gates in T1 and T2 can be accessed from here.

T2 arriving passengers have a slightly easier time with a dedicated transit corridor equipped with its own Immigration counter and security check. Passengers can then easily access the T2 gates or alternatively can follow the warren of corridors to gates in T1.

So, other than delaying and irritating passengers, why does all this matter?

There are a number of serious disadvantages to the current system for transit passengers, for airlines and for state officials such as Immigration officers and Customs officials.

Manpower

Firstly, requiring all passengers transiting through Dublin airport to pass Immigration is a waste of resources. Why should already stretched Immigration officers be wasting time checking people who do not want to come into Ireland? Under the current layout of T1, there is no route for transit passengers to be channeled directly to security screening and as such all passengers must pass one of the two T1 Immigration points as if entering Ireland. In T2, there is such a channel although all passengers are still required to pass Immigration. This system wastes time, delays transiting passengers and is a waste of state resources. It also adds unnecessarily to lines at Immigration for actual Dublin bound passengers in T1.

Inherent Risks

Secondly, requiring passengers to clear Irish Immigration presents risks. The current system provides the possibility for transiting passengers to abscond without the knowledge of the Immigration officials. For example, there is nothing to stop transiting passengers arriving into any gate in T1 stating their intention is to transit and then simply walking out the exit by customs in the baggage hall. The cost of an onward flight and pre-printed boarding pass may prove a worthwhile investment for someone intending on sneaking into the country, or heading onward to the UK by land or sea. Furthermore, Immigration officers have no way of knowing if the transit passenger did in fact board their onward flight. This route may be of particular interest to nationals of countries who do need a visa to enter Ireland, but are exempt from needing transit visas. Similarly, it could be a route into the UK without meeting UK Border Agency checks.

As mentioned above, passengers arriving into the "200s" gates have free reign to board flights as they wish and are not security screened. With security screening this would make sense, however not where domestic and international flights depart from the same area. Under the current system a passenger can arrive off a Air France/CityJet flight from Paris and, un checked, catch the next AerArann/FlyBe flight to Donegal.

Adding further to this failure of airport design, passengers heading on domestic flights are routinely mingled with those heading abroad. This means that any transiting passenger, no matter which gate they arrive at, could simply buy a second onward flight from Dublin (a cheap Ryanair to Cork for example). By showing the first onward (International) boarding pass to Immigration officials, and keeping their second (Domestic) boarding pass hidden in their pocket, they can in effect enter Ireland without the appropriate documents. On arrival in Cork or Donegal these "domestic passengers" are of course not subject to immigration checks. There is also a chance that one could fly onward to the UK, however it's likely they would be stopped by an airline agent on boarding. If by chance they were not stopped by boarding staff, that passenger would not face any UK Border Agency checks on arrival to their UK destination. In either case if the passenger were refused boarding by airline officials, they could always revert to the Donegal option and catch the Donegal-Glasgow direct bus run by Feda brothers.

Effective Customs Enforcement

Thirdly, the current lack of distinction between domestic and international flights hinders effective Customs checks. As there is no distinction between domestic and international flights, never mind EU and Non-EU ones, transiting passengers who connect through Dublin to say Cork or Donegal, don't clear their luggage and are highly unlikely to be checked at their final destination arriving off a Dublin flight. Whilst the EU system for applying green striped checked bag tags was designed to highlight passengers arriving from Non-EU embarkation airports, clearly this is useless for passengers with no checked luggage and in any case this system is routinely ignored by overstretched Customs staff. Passengers seldom read, never mind respect, the colour coded customs channels on exiting either baggage hall in Dublin.

Irritating Passengers

A difficult transit system irritates passengers and is therefore is bad for airlines as well as the Dublin Airport Authority coffers. Less transit passengers equals less flight tickets sold, less snacks bought in transit and less landing fees collected.

Why would passengers choose a difficult transit in Dublin when so many alternatives are available? In most major European hub airports, transiting passengers can simply pass security screening and hop onto their connecting flight. They are only required to pass Immigration where they plan on entering that country or if their onward flight is domestic/Schengen. Other airports have gone further to allow passengers to even change terminals whilst staying airside. Frankfurt, for example, uses designated carriages on their monorail system whilst other airports use corridors (Amsterdam) or shuttle busses (Heathrow, St.Petersburg, Munich).

Thankfully, airside transit between T1 and T2 does exist in Dublin, however unlike landside, only gate numbers are signposted and it is assumed that passengers know all the "100s, 200s and 300s" gates are in T1 and that the "400s" are in T2. Another difficulty is the sheer distance and the lack of airside transit desks for most airlines. A passenger arriving into T2 unfortunate enough to have a connection from the "100s" gates in T1 had better have their hiking boots on and, in most cases, had better have their boarding pass in hand as they will not find a transit desk en-route. This is made worse still in T1 where most check-in desks are not equipped to print boarding passes (although this is scheduled to change). Non-EU/EEA Ryanair passengers cannot transit by following the signs even if they do have their onward boarding pass as they require a Ryanair “Visa-Checked” stamp on their boarding pass which is only available in the T1 Check-In area. Unlucky Non-EU/EEA passengers normally learn this at the boarding gate when it's too late to go back and they miss their flight without refund.

Low Cost Carriers and "Self Interlining"

Far from trying to simply catch up with international  competitor airports, Dublin should embrace its low cost carrier airlines and maximise connectivity options for passengers. Low cost carriers such as Ryanair focus on point to point sales leaving their passengers to work out the logistics and take the risks of "self-interlining." Similarly they will not check your bag through to your final destination, rather requiring you to re check yourself after each flight. The difficulty with this is the need to get to the baggage hall and check-in desks to do this - not an easy task if you require a visa for Ireland and arrive into T2. Arriving into T1 does allow access to the baggage hall, re-checking your bag however will require an illegal, and awkward, de-tour via Customs and upstairs to departures similar to those seeking the elusive "Visa Checked" stamp.

Connections across the Atlantic

With US PreFlight Clearance in Ireland, Dublin (and Shannon) have a unique opportunity to provide transit opportunities for trans-atlantic passengers. With these flights deemed domestic US flights, passengers can avoid lengthy queues on arrival in the USA and there is the opportunity to open routes into cheaper domestic airports. Currently there are daily flights to New York (AerLingus and Delta) Newark (United/Continental) Boston (AerLingus), Chicago (AerLingus and American Airlines), Philadelphia (US Airways), Atlanta (Delta), and Orlando (AerLingus).

If Dublin can develop convenient transit services it is in a prime position to maximise through passenger ticket sales and hence revenues for airlines as well as the Dublin Airport Authority and its shops and restaurants.

What is the solution?

The solution to these problems is a little more complex than simply inserting transit channels which bypass Immigration and direct passengers through security to their next flight gate.

Common Travel Area

Firstly comes the question of Irish domestic flights and our commitments under the Ireland and UK Common Travel Area. Clearly passengers connecting to flights within Ireland will need to clear Immigration in Dublin, but as the UK Border agency do not check passengers arriving from Ireland (or elsewhere within the Common Travel Area), does that also mean passengers on UK bound flights must also be excluded from Immigration avoiding transit channels ? The answer is probably yes.

This will likely require physical segregation of passengers heading to Irish and UK destinations from all other passengers, probably by means of designating a particular area for all Irish and UK flights.

An alternative option might see a boarding pass control (or bar code scanner) positioned to halt Ireland and UK bound transit passengers from using Immigration avoiding transit corridors.

Both options present drawbacks. The first option would be difficult to implement, would require major physical changes to the airport and might cause difficulties for airlines who currently turnaround aircraft arriving from Ireland or the UK which go on to depart for other destinations. It would also likely frustrate any airlines ambition of keeping all their flights in one area of the airport. On both of these points Ryanair may stand to be impacted the most as it operates almost all of its flights from the "100s" gates. Aer Lingus too may have difficulties, although they already have their AerLingus Regional flights (operated by AerArann) and some other morning flights using gates far from their advertised "New Home" in  T2. On the positive side however, having a designated Ireland Domestic plus UK area would be much more secure, would eliminate the risk posed by double boarding card holders and would reduce the demand on state services.

Such an area, with Ireland and UK bound passenger segregation, would allow the state to consider its policy of checking ID of passengers arriving from within the Irish and UK Common Travel Area, something long abandoned by land or sea. Do we need to bother checking passports of those arriving off flights from the UK when anyone trying to avoid the checks knows they can simply use the ferry or bus via Belfast?

The second option, using a barcode reader to halt Irish and UK bound passengers using the immigration avoiding transit channels, could be a stop gap but leaves the gate wide open for double boarding pass holders and is therefore not a great solution.

Time for a Plan

In conclusion, the current system for passenger transit in Dublin Airport is flawed. It is over burdensome on state services, is not convenient for passengers and has a few loop holes which need to be addressed. The solutions are not going to be easy due to the layout and design of the terminals. Furthermore, any changes made will demand a major re-examination of how we approach the Ireland and UK Common Travel Area. We will also need to consider our willingness to facilitate low cost carrier self interlining and what we expect in terms of Customs checks. Difficult as it may be, Dublin Airport needs to wake up and take on this challenge or it will continue to see passengers go elsewhere.

Joe O Murchadha
22 APR 2012


Dublin Airport Authority Maps - Click Here
AerLingus Connection Info - Click Here
Irish Aviation Authority ICAO Docking Chart - Click Here


Disclaimer - Policies, regulations and procedures on the ground change from time to time, however a diligent effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information.